Using UDP for Internet Transport Evolution
نویسندگان
چکیده
The increasing use of middleboxes (e.g., NATs, firewalls) in the Internet has made it harder and harder to deploy new transport or higher layer protocols, or even extensions to existing ones. Current work to address this Internet transport ossification has led to renewed interest in UDP as an encapsulation for making novel transport protocols deployable in the Internet. Examples include Google’s QUIC and the WebRTC data channel. The common assumption made by these approaches is that encapsulation over UDP works in the present Internet. This paper presents a measurement study to examine this assumption, and provides guidance for protocol design based on our measurements. The key question is “can we run new transport protocols for the Internet over UDP?” We find that the answer is largely “yes”: UDP works on most networks, and impairments are generally confined to access networks. This allows relatively simple fallback strategies to work around it. Our answer is based on a twofold methodology. First, we use the RIPE Atlas platform to basically check UDP connectivity and first-packet latency. Second, we deploy copycat, a new tool for comparing TCP loss, latency, and throughput with UDP by generating TCP-shaped traffic with UDP headers.
منابع مشابه
Breaking Up the Transport Logjam
Current Internet transports conflate transport semantics with endpoint addressing and flow regulation, creating roadblocks to Internet evolution that we propose to address with a new layering model. Factoring endpoint addressing (port numbers) into a separate Endpoint Layer permits incremental rollout of new or improved transports at OS or application level, enables transport-oblivious firewall...
متن کاملPerformance analysis of TCP and UDP using Opnet Simulator
95 Abstract — the transport layer protocols provide connectionoriented sessions and reliable data delivery services. This paper seeks to reflect a comparative analysis between the two transport layer protocols, which are TCP/IP and UDP/IP, as well to observe the effect of using these two protocols in a client server network. The similarities and differences between TCP and UDP over the Internet...
متن کاملReinterpreting the Transport Protocol Stack to Embrace Ossification – Position Paper
Ubiquitous deployment of middleboxes has resulted in ossification of the transport layer, with TCP and UDP becoming part of the narrow waist of the Internet. This is a necessary stage in the evolution of the network, caused by its progression from research, to production, to increasingly critical infrastructure. New transport layer protocols will be needed in future, but since we are working wi...
متن کاملAn IPv6-to-IPv4 Transport Relay Translator
Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract The document describes an IPv6-to-IPv4 transport relay translator (TRT). It enables IPv6-only hosts to exchange {TCP,UDP} traffic with IPv4-only hosts. A TRT system, which locates in the middle, translates {TCP,UDP}...
متن کاملA Transport-Level Proxy for Secure Multimedia Streams
service, firewalls need more than static packet filtering and application-level proxies. SOCKS is an application-independent transport-level proxy that offers user-level authentication and data encryption. An extended SOCKS UDP binding model with appropriate socket calls is proposed to provide complete support for UDP-based, multimedia streaming applications. T he increasing popularity of multi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1612.07816 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016